WHAT IS “JOHN DOE” ORDERS?

The John Doe injunction is an exparte remedy wanted in anticipation of an infringing act against unknown /nameless defendants/infringers whose identity is not familiar to the complainant at the time it is issued. To avoid delay in rendering justice the courts names the litigator as John Doe (Ashok kumar Orders in India) till such time the litigator is known.

WHAT IS “JOHN DOE” ORDERS?

MEANING OF “JOHN DOE” ORDERS?

John Doe order is a pre-infringement injunction remedy provided to shield the intellectual property rights of the creator of creative works like movies, songs, etc. John Doe order is additionally referred to as Rolling Anton Pillar, Anton Pillar or Ashok Kumar order.

The John Doe injunction is an exparte remedy wanted in anticipation of an infringing act against unknown /nameless defendants/infringers whose identity is not familiar to the complainant at the time it is issued. To avoid delay in rendering justice the courts names the litigator as John Doe (Ashok kumar Orders in India) till such time the litigator is known. Therefore, John Doe is basically a party in a legal proceeding whose name is unknown[1].

What Are John Doe Orders And In Which Situations They Are Granted

ORIGIN

The practice originally started in England throughout the reign of King Edward III(1312- 1377). It had been interrupted in 1852. The primary John Doe since 1852 was obtained by author J.K.Rowling and her Publishers in 2005 against an unknown litigant because they worried that the person would sell one of her novels that was not published then “Harry Potter and The Order of The Phoenix.[2]

PROCEDURE OF OBTAINING JOHN DOE ORDERS IN INDIA

The John Doe order is granted under Order 39 Rule one and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC)[3] read with section ‘151 of CPC’ and provisions of ‘Special Relief Act 1963’,  however it prevails sort of a final injunction.

There are few conditions to induce a John Doe order:

  • Firstly, the litigant must satisfy the Court that his/her right has been infringed; with instances of the previous breach and scattered infringement by known and unknown persons.
  • Secondly, the litigant must establish a clear case before any pre-emptive relief is granted.
  • Thirdly, the litigant must establish that, within the absence of the requested John Doe order, defendant’s actions can probably lead to some monetary or irreparable damages.

 

JUDICIAL GUIDELINES ON JOHN DOE ORDERS

In Eros International v BSNL[4], the Bombay state supreme court issued guidelines not only for the manager authorities however additionally for the jury and therefore the complainant, to handle the unknown defendants, particularly ISPs and unidentified bloggers United Nations agency violate the piracy laws. the rules are as follows:

  • The copyright holder should verify and manifest the alleged illicit links before submitting a request to block them.
  • The Courts whereas issuing a John Doe order, are suggested to review the list and verify the credibility or delegate a neutral third party to try and do so.
  • The ISPs are educated to show a message on the blocked webpage that features the particulars of the case and therefore the reasons for interference.
  • Websites would be blocked for under twenty one days, and for extension of the ban, the complainant would be needed to approach the court.

 

JOHN DOE ORDERS IN INDIA

The conception behind the john Doe order arises from varied things like a court should pass such orders even before the infringement. Ordered in style of Quia Timet injunction, it's done to safeguard the rights of the litigator associated to restrain vulnerable or at hand wrongful acts of an unknown litigant. In India, John Doe order has not been extended on the far side as individuals are unaware of its existence; though it was already provided in our criminal legislations for defense of Intellectual Property infringement.[5]

In Tej tv Ltd v Rajan Mandal[6], the Old Delhi judicature for the primary time ever passed an ex-parte interim order permitting the litigant to search and seize equipment and devices of unknown defendants, so beginning the jurisprudence of passing orders against unknown defendant/s, that is often called John Doe’s/ Ashok Kumar’s order. This case provided its due recognition to the john Doe orders in Republic of India and after this order, the opposite courts have used similar premises to guard the rights of the creator of the intellectual property.

HOW MOVIE TITLES ARE PROTECTED UNDER TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT LAW, TO KNOW MORE, VISIT -

JOHN DOE ORDER AND MEDIA INDUSTRY

The problem of piracy has been on a rise in many sectors of the media business. Piracy causes losses to the investors as a result of people who transfer a moving picture or a video on the web don't pay any quite royalty to the investors, nor do they pay the right duty to the govt. Therefore, this causes losses to each the govt. and therefore the investors.

With the net saturation on an increase in India, the evil of on-line piracy is growing  at associate forbidding rate, and to fight with the matter of piracy, the govt. of India was compelled to issue the knowledge Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 that mandate associate negotiator to look at due diligence whereas discharging its duties and not wittingly host or publish any data that infringes the Intellectual Property Rights of anyone, however the rules wouldn't stop the piracy owing to the bigness of the domain.

Most of such records are created obtainable on totally different websites, on or before the date of unharness in conjunction with varied alternative platforms like CDs, DVDs, etc. once a record is uploaded on the web, it opens the floodgates for the plenty to transfer it, thereby, inflicting significant losses to the creators. The foremost troublesome factor within the current piracy world is that the one who uploads such records on the web is unknown to the planet. Therefore, preventive action within the nature of ‘John Doe orders’ has become vital globally to stop intellectual property right infringements.

 

CONCLUSION

The term ‘John Doe’ order traces its origin all the way to medieval England, they are typically indicated towards orders directed against persons or teams that aren't recognisable. Oxford lexicon outlined John Doe as “Anonymous Party”. These orders are vital in trendy days, where technology and the massive influence of social media teams build identification quite exhausting.

They are typically used once the grievance finds it hard to spot the precise details of the suspect who are protected by the expanse and namelessness notably of the cyber world. John Doe orders offer relief to the victims and grant timely protection of their rights by avoiding the delay and difficulties in seeking relief thanks to namelessness of the offenders. Ashok Kumar is that the Indian substitute of John Doe and no-one is aware of however the name came to be used as a local substitute for John Doe. however the name has gained legal acceptableness, according to India. In India, this order is generally associated with pirating of flicks, illegal broadcasting of channels, and misappropriated business of books, among others.

 

SUBMITTED BY- RISHIKA KAPOOR

 

[1] (Definition of JOHN DOE, 2021)

[2] (Obtaining a John Doe order - Press Gazette, 2021)

[3] (India Code: Home, 2021)

[4] Eros International and Anr v BSNL & Others CS(OS) No 2315/2016

[5] (Nishithdesai.com)

[6] Tej Tv Ltd v Rajan Mandal [2003] FSR 22