Can a Motion Be Registered as a Trademark in India?

Introduction

Trademarks serve as essential tools for brand recognition, allowing businesses to differentiate themselves in a competitive market. Traditionally, trademarks have included words, logos, and symbols, but with technological advancements and evolving branding strategies, non-conventional trademarks—such as colors, shapes, scents, sounds, and motions—have gained importance.

Among these, motion trademarks (also called moving trademarks) are an emerging category. These marks consist of animations, sequences of movement, or video clips that serve as brand identifiers. However, the Trade Marks Act, 1999 does not explicitly recognize motion marks, leading to legal uncertainties about their registrability in India.

This article examines the feasibility of registering motion marks in India, the relevant legal framework, key case laws, registration challenges, and potential solutions to bring India’s trademark system in line with global best practices.

Understanding Motion Marks

What is a Motion Mark?

A motion mark is a moving visual element used to identify a business, product, or service. Unlike traditional trademarks, which are static, motion marks involve animation or a sequence of frames that visually represent a brand. These marks often include a combination of moving pictures and sound, making them distinct and memorable.

Legal Basis for Motion Marks in India

The Trade Marks Act, 1999, which governs trademark registration in India, does not explicitly define motion marks. However, Section 2(zb) of the Act defines a trademark as:

"A mark capable of being represented graphically and distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of others."

The requirement of graphical representation plays a crucial role in trademark registration. Since motion marks involve movement, representing them graphically (through images or descriptions) becomes challenging under the current legal framework.

International Perspective on Motion Trademarks

Acceptance of Motion Marks Worldwide

Several countries recognize and register motion trademarks. Notable examples include:

1. United States (USPTO):
• The first registered motion trademark was Columbia Pictures’ animated logo of a woman carrying a torch (1996).
• The USPTO allows submission of video files, sequential images, and detailed descriptions to register motion marks.
2. European Union (EUIPO):
• The EUIPO officially recognizes motion marks and allows digital submissions, including MP4 video files.

India’s Global Intellectual Property (IP) Commitments

India is a signatory to:

• The TRIPS Agreement (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights), which sets minimum standards for IP protection.
• The Madrid Protocol, which facilitates international trademark registration.

Given these commitments, India is expected to progressively adapt its trademark laws to include non-conventional marks like motion trademarks.

To know more about this you can follwo the link below:

Motion Marks in India: Legal and Practical Feasibility

Challenges in Registering Motion Marks

The biggest hurdles in registering motion marks in India include:

1. Graphical Representation Requirement
• Indian trademark law mandates that all marks be capable of being represented graphically.
• Motion marks, which involve movement, are difficult to capture in static images.
2. Lack of Legal Precedents
• Unlike sound trademarks (e.g., Nokia’s tune, which was recognized as a trademark), motion marks lack established legal recognition in India.
3. Distinctiveness and Functionality
• A motion mark must be:
• Distinctive: It should be uniquely identifiable with a brand.
• Non-functional: The motion should not serve a practical purpose but act as a source identifier.
4. Technological Limitations in the Trademark Registry
• The Indian Trademark Office does not currently accept video or multimedia submissions.
• Applicants must rely on sequential image frames and written descriptions, which may not fully capture the essence of a motion mark.

Case Studies: Motion Marks in India

Despite these challenges, a few motion marks have been submitted for registration in India:

1. Nokia’s "Connecting Hands" Motion Mark (2003)

• Nokia submitted its famous "Connecting Hands" animation (a moving logo of two hands connecting) for registration.
• However, due to legal ambiguities, the mark was registered as a device mark, not explicitly as a motion mark.

2. Toshiba’s Motion Mark (2019)

• Toshiba filed for motion trademark registration in India.
• Initially, the Registrar opposed the application, arguing that motion marks were not explicitly recognized under Indian law.
• After a legal battle, the mark was accepted in 2019.

These cases highlight the uncertainties and inconsistencies in registering motion trademarks under India’s current trademark regime.

Key Challenges in Registering Motion Marks in India

1. Graphical Representation and Practical Implementation
• Unlike EUIPO, which accepts video submissions, India still relies on static images and written descriptions, making registration difficult.
2. Lack of Legal Precedents and Guidelines
• While sound marks have been recognized (e.g., Yahoo! Yodel and Nokia Tune), motion marks remain undefined and unregulated in Indian trademark law.
3. Proving Distinctiveness and Consumer Recognition
• Motion marks must be widely recognized by consumers to qualify for trademark protection.
• Companies must provide advertising data, consumer surveys, and sales figures to prove acquired distinctiveness.
4. Opposition and Enforcement Issues
• Due to the novelty of motion marks, applications may face objections from the Registrar and opposition from competitors.
• Enforcing rights over motion marks is complex, as Indian courts may lack expertise in handling such cases.

Potential Solutions for Recognizing Motion Marks in India

1. Upgrading the Trademark Registry with Digital Capabilities

• The Trademark Office should allow video submissions (similar to EUIPO and USPTO).
• This would enable better representation of motion marks and simplify the registration process.

2. Issuing Clear Guidelines for Motion Mark Registration

• The Indian Trademark Office should introduce specific rules on:
• Acceptable forms of graphical representation (e.g., video files, sequential frames).
• Criteria for distinctiveness and consumer recognition.
• Examination procedures for motion trademarks.

3. Increasing Awareness and Judicial Recognition

• Conduct training programs for trademark examiners and legal professionals.
• Encourage judicial rulings on motion marks to create legal precedents.

4. Strengthening Proof of Distinctiveness

• Companies should submit:
• Consumer surveys proving public recognition of the motion mark.
• Advertising campaigns demonstrating widespread brand association.

Conclusion

Motion trademarks represent the future of branding, especially in a digital-first world. However, India’s trademark law has yet to fully embrace motion marks, primarily due to graphical representation requirements, lack of legal recognition, and technological constraints. While there is no outright prohibition on motion marks, the uncertainty in registration and enforcement makes it challenging for businesses to protect such trademarks.