COPYRIGHT: DELHI HC'S ORDER TO DEPOSIT MONEY FOR USE OF COPYRIGHTED MUSIC IN WEDDING SANGEET; AN ANALYSIS  

INTRODUCTION

In a significant and high-profile decision earlier this year, the Delhi High Court made a ruling that has brought much-needed attention to the intersection of intellectual property law and cultural practices in India. The case, Canvas Communications vs. Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL), delves into the complex issues surrounding copyright law and its application to traditional and culturally significant events, specifically wedding ceremonies and their associated activities. The plaintiff, Canvas Communications, a prominent event management company, sought clarification on whether music played at wedding events, including Sangeet and cocktail parties, required a license from PPL, the governing body for sound recording licenses in India. At the heart of the case is the interpretation of Section 52(1)(za) of the Indian Copyright Act, which provides exemptions for the use of copyrighted works during "religious ceremonies." The court’s interim order reflects an evolving understanding of copyright in India, balancing the rights of copyright holders with the need to preserve cultural traditions.

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

Canvas Communications, known for organizing large-scale events such as weddings, found itself embroiled in a legal dispute with Phonographic Performance Limited, a collective organization that administers licenses on behalf of music labels. The issue arose when Canvas sought clarity about whether they needed a license for playing music at weddings and associated activities like Sangeet (a pre-wedding musical celebration) and cocktail parties. The defendant, PPL, maintained that licensing should be required for these events, as they are not directly related to the wedding ceremony but are commercial in nature. This dispute led to the legal question of whether such activities should be considered exempt from copyright law under the provisions of Section 52(1)(za), which grants an exemption for the use of copyrighted works during “spiritual ceremonies.”

Canvas Communications argued that these traditional pre-wedding and post-wedding functions should fall under this exemption, as they are deeply rooted in the cultural and spiritual aspects of the wedding process. The company pointed to a statement issued by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) in 2023, which clarified that weddings and related functions should be exempt from licensing requirements. According to Canvas, applying licensing to these events would impose undue financial burdens on wedding organizers and contravene the spirit of the law. PPL, however, disagreed, asserting that the exemption should only apply to the core religious ceremony itself and not to the ancillary social events, which are inherently commercial in nature.

LEGAL FINDINGS AND ARGUMENTS

At the core of this legal debate is the interpretation of Section 52(1)(za) of the Indian Copyright Act. This provision provides an exemption for the use of copyrighted works in religious ceremonies, but the broader application of this exemption is contested. Canvas Communications argued that pre-wedding activities like Sangeet and cocktail parties are inseparable from the wedding ceremony and should thus be covered by the exemption. They emphasized that the spirit of the law is to protect cultural practices, and placing additional financial burdens on organizers would be detrimental to traditional celebrations.

On the other hand, PPL’s stance was rooted in the concern that the exemption, if applied broadly, could lead to exploitation. PPL argued that applying the exemption to non-religious wedding events like cocktail parties, which often have a commercial aspect, would undermine the music industry’s ability to earn fair compensation for the use of copyrighted works. Additionally, PPL expressed concerns about the misuse of such exemptions by individuals or organizations that may falsely label commercial events as “wedding-related” to avoid paying licensing fees. The heart of PPL’s defense was the need for a clear line between religious ceremonies and the commercialized aspects of weddings to maintain equity for copyright holders and musicians.

To know more about copyright in music industry you can follow the link below:

COURT’S INTERIM ORDER

After hearing arguments from both parties, the Delhi High Court issued a temporary order on the matter. The court’s ruling, however, did not definitively address whether pre-wedding and post-wedding events should be exempt from licensing under copyright law. Instead, the court provided a temporary solution to enable the continuation of wedding events without interruption while the matter is further explored. The court directed Canvas Communications to deposit a fee of Rs. 100,000 to PPL for the use of music at the upcoming events, effectively allowing the music to be played during the events while ensuring that PPL was compensated for the use of copyrighted works.

This interim order was framed as a provisional measure to balance the interests of both parties while the case is pending. The court’s approach acknowledges the cultural importance of music at weddings and the role it plays in traditional celebrations but also emphasizes the need to protect the rights of copyright holders, ensuring that musicians and record labels are compensated for the use of their creative works.

The court did not establish a permanent precedent but rather set the stage for further legal deliberations on the issue. By issuing the interim injunction, the court made it clear that it sought to strike a balance between protecting cultural practices and upholding copyright law. This temporary decision allows wedding organizers to move forward with their plans while ensuring that the rights of the music industry are not overlooked.

IMPLICATIONS FOR COPYRIGHT LAW IN INDIA

The case of Canvas Communications vs. Phonographic Performance Limited brings to the forefront the ongoing evolution of copyright law in India, particularly in the context of traditional and cultural events. The legal question of whether wedding-related activities should fall under the exemption for “religious ceremonies” is not merely a technical legal debate but also one that touches upon the broader implications of how copyright law interacts with cultural practices. As India’s music and entertainment industries continue to grow, the country faces the challenge of modernizing its copyright laws to account for both cultural traditions and the rights of creators. The interim ruling reflects a growing recognition of the need to adapt copyright law to contemporary practices without stifling traditional celebrations. While the final decision on the case is still pending, the court’s cautious approach to balancing the rights of copyright holders and cultural customs is a significant step in addressing the complexities of intellectual property law in India.

This case also sets an important precedent for future disputes involving copyright exemptions in traditional events. If the court ultimately rules in favor of a broader interpretation of the exemption, it could pave the way for a more lenient approach to cultural events in India, potentially expanding the scope of copyright exemptions for other traditional celebrations. On the other hand, if the court maintains a narrow interpretation, wedding planners and venues may face increased legal requirements for licensing music at events, which could have broader implications for the Indian event industry.

CONCLUSION

The Canvas Communications vs. Phonographic Performance Limited case highlights the delicate balance between copyright law and cultural practices in India. With weddings being an integral part of Indian society, the legal framework surrounding them must be flexible enough to accommodate traditional events while ensuring fair compensation for creators. The Delhi High Court’s interim decision is a step towards striking this balance, providing temporary relief to wedding organizers while keeping the larger legal question under judicial review. As the case progresses, it is likely to have profound implications for the future of copyright law in India, particularly in the context of cultural events, and may shape the legal landscape for years to come.