How to Resolve a Copyright Discrepancy Notice in India – Legal Remedies & Process
Learn how to handle copyright discrepancy notices under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. This guide covers the objection process, legal grounds, required documents, and how to effectively respond to the Registrar of Copyrights to ensure successful registration.

INTRODUCTION
Copyright is a legal right granted to creators of original works, it gives them certain exclusive rights over their work and how the work is to be used and distributed. These rights apply to a wide range of creative expressions, including books, poems, songs, paintings, movies, software programs, websites, architectural designs, and more. The core idea behind copyright is to encourage creativity and innovation by ensuring that creators are rewarded for their time, effort, and originality.
Copyright provides the creator with several exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce the work, distribute copies, perform or display the work publicly, and create derivative works. These rights can be licensed or transferred to others, allowing for commercial use or collaboration while still protecting the original creator’s interests. Importantly, copyright does not protect facts, ideas, methods, or systems—only the specific way those ideas are expressed.
COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION AND ITS PROCESS
The Copyright Act, 1957, does not mandate registration of copyright in order to get protection for original work. However, according to Section 14, the registration of copyright offers additional legal and evidentiary benefits, especially in the context of enforcement and litigation. As per Section 48 of the Copyright Act, the entries made in the Register of Copyrights maintained by the Registrar of Copyrights serve as prima facie evidence of the particulars entered therein.
The owner of a copyright is entitled to civil remedies in case of infringement of any of its copyrighted work under Section 55 of the act. A registered copyright simplifies the process of enforcement by reducing the burden of proving ownership and originality, which otherwise must be established independently in court. The process of registration of copyright is as follows:
1. In order to initiate the process an application must be filed in the prescribed form along with the requisite fee. The application should include details of the work, such as the title, nature of the work, the name and address of the author and owner, the language of the work, and the date of publication if applicable. Each work requires a separate application.
2. Upon receipt of application, the registrar acknowledges the application which is followed by a mandatory 30 day waiting period, during which objections are raised by interested parties, if any.
3. If no objections are raised within the 30-day period, the application is examined by the Copyright Office. In the case of any discrepancies or requirements for additional information, the Registrar may correspond with the applicant for clarifications.
4. If the Registrar is satisfied that all legal requirements have been fulfilled, the work is entered into the Register of Copyrights under Section 45, and a Certificate of Registration is issued to the applicant.
5. In the event of objections being filed, the Registrar examines the submissions of both parties and may conduct a hearing if necessary.
WHAT IS A COPYRIGHT OBJECTION AND DISCRIPANCY
After an application is made for registration of copyright, the mandatory 30 days waiting period allows scrutiny and room for objection and identification of any discrepancies before the work is officially registered. Section 45 of the Act, read with Rule 70 of the Copyright Rules, 2013 ensures that the copyright is granted to the rightful creator or owner and that no fraudulent or conflicting claims are entertained.
A copyright objection refers to a formal challenge raised by a third party during the registration process. During the mandatory waiting period of 30 days anyone who believes that the applicant is not the rightful owner of the work or that the work does not qualify for copyright protection may file an objection with valid grounds.
The discrepancies in an application refers to errors, inconsistencies, or omissions found within the application. These may involve incorrect personal details, incomplete descriptions of the work, missing supporting documents, or inconsistencies between the actual work and the information provided. Discrepancies in copyright application is identified by the copyright office during its internal examination
To know more about this you can follow the link below:
GROUNDS OF COPYRIGHT OBJECTIONS
The grounds of objections to copyright application are not exhaustively defined in the Act but can be derived from general principles of copyright law, case precedents, and procedural rules. A common ground for objection is the lack of originality in the work. As per judicial interpretation, copyright protection extends only to original works meaning works that originate from the author and involve a minimum degree of creativity. If the work is found to be copied, derivative without proper authorization, or a compilation of public domain materials without any creative input, it may be objected to.
In addition to formal objections, the Registrar may also detect discrepancies during the scrutiny of the application. These discrepancies can include incomplete or incorrect information in the application, such as the wrong classification of the work, inconsistent dates of publication, non-submission of required documents, or false declarations.
PROCEDURE TO RESOLVE A COPYRIGHT DISCRIPANCY NOTICE
1. Reviewing the contents of the notice- Common discrepancies may relate to incorrect categorization of the work, lack of proof of authorship or ownership, missing signatures, insufficient documentation, or conflicts with previously registered works. The applicant is expected to respond to the notice within the time specified.
2. Reply to the notice- When a copyright discrepancy or objection arises during the registration process under the Copyright Act, 1957, the applicant has the legal right and responsibility to respond appropriately to ensure the claim is duly considered. The Registrar of Copyrights will notify the applicant and provide a reasonable opportunity to respond. The reply should be drafted in a formal written submission, addressing the specific grounds of the objection, supported with relevant facts, documentary evidence, and legal justification to establish the legitimacy of the applicant’s claim to authorship or ownership. This may include providing prior publication records, assignment deeds, contracts, or affidavits from co-creators or witnesses.
3. Objection by third parties- If the discrepancy involves an objection from a third party during the 30-day public notice period (as per Rule 70), a quasi-judicial process may follow. Both parties, the applicant and the objector may be called for a hearing. The applicant must present evidence to prove rightful ownership or originality of the work.
Once the discrepancy is satisfactorily resolved and the Registrar is convinced of the validity and completeness of the application, the copyright will be registered, and an entry will be made in the Register of Copyrights. The applicant is then issued a Certificate of Registration, confirming that the copyright in the specified work is duly recorded.
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO FILE A COPYRIGHT OBJECTION REPLY
To effectively file a reply to such an objection, the following key documents are typically required:
1. Counter Statement or Reply Affidavit
This is the main document that contains the response to the objection raised. It should outline a clear rebuttal to the grounds of objection. It shall also include legal and factual justifications for the copyright claim and references to prior creation or use, if applicable.
2. Proof of Authorship or Ownership
In order to support the claim of authorship or ownership, documents such as Manuscripts or drafts, Photographs of original artwork, Music compositions or audio files, Design files, software code, etc., depending on the type of work must also be attached.
3. Date of Creation and Publication Proof
To establish prior creation, the applicant must submit emails or correspondence showing creation and sharing of the work publisher’s certificate or contract (if published) etc.
4. Assignment or Licensing Agreements (if applicable)
If the applicant is not the original creator but a licensee or assignee, a registered assignment deed or license agreement must be submitted in compliance with Section 19 and Section 30 of the Act, which govern the legal transfer of copyright.
5. Identity and Address Proof
To verify the identity of the respondent, documents such as PAN Card, Aadhar card, Passport etc may be provided.
6. Supporting Legal Precedents or Expert Opinions (optional)
Where necessary, legal counsel may include relevant case law or legal opinion to strengthen the reply, particularly in cases involving derivative works, joint authorship, or complex copyright claims.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT REPLYING TO COPYRIGHT OBJECTIONS
When an objection is raised during the copyright registration process, the applicant is required to respond within a reasonable time to defend their claim of authorship or ownership. If the applicant fails to respond to the notice of objection issued by the Copyright Office, it may lead to serious consequences. Most notably, the Registrar of Copyrights has the authority to reject the application for registration. Silence or inaction on the part of the applicant is generally taken as a waiver of interest or an inability to defend the originality or ownership of the work. As a result, the copyright may not be entered into the Register of Copyrights under Section 45 of the Copyright Act, 1957, effectively denying the applicant the legal advantages of having a registered copyright.
CONCLUSION
Clearing a copyright discrepancy notice is a crucial part of the registration process and serves as a legal safeguard to prevent false or fraudulent claims. An applicant’s proactive approach by reviewing the notice, submitting an evidence-based reply, and participating in any hearings can significantly influence the outcome. Proper documentation and legal clarity help establish rightful ownership and originality. Failure to address objections can result in rejection of the application, thereby denying the applicant the protective shield of registration. Therefore, understanding the nuances of copyright objections and responding diligently is essential for creators and rights holders aiming to secure and enforce their intellectual property rights.