“GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS: HOW PLACES BECOME BRANDS”
Geographical indications (GIs) are unique markers that connect products with their specific place of origin, reflecting inherent quality, traditional know‐how, and cultural heritage. This article examines how places become brands through the legal and economic power of GIs. It discusses the international framework under TRIPS and the European Union’s PDO/PGI/TSG system, while then focusing on India’s sui generis system under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999. Key examples such as Darjeeling tea, Basmati rice, and other regional specialties demonstrate how GIs protect traditional products, support rural development and enhance global competitiveness.

Introduction
Geographical indications (GIs) are far more than simple labels. They are a form of intellectual property that certifies a product’s unique qualities whether in taste, texture, or craftsmanship are inherently linked to its geographical origin. In today’s globalized market, where authenticity and quality are major factors influencing consumer choices, GIs serve as powerful branding tools that help consumers identify genuine products and protect the economic interests of local producers. This article explores how places become brands by examining both international and domestic legal frameworks and by highlighting prominent examples.
The Essence of Geographical Indications
GIs identify goods as originating from a specific territory, where the product’s quality or reputation is essentially attributable to that geographical region. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) describes a GI as “a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities, a reputation or other characteristics essentially attributable to that origin”[1]. This close link often encapsulated in the concept of ‘terroir’ distinguishes GIs from conventional trademarks, which only indicate the commercial source of a product.
By protecting the name and associated production methods, GIs safeguard centuries of traditional knowledge and cultural heritage. For example, products such as Champagne, Parmigiano-Reggiano and Roquefort are not merely identified by their regions; they also adhere to strict production standards and histories that are inseparable from those locales[2].
Global Perspectives on Geographical Indications
At the international level, GIs are central to preserving regional brands. Under the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), all WTO member countries are required to provide effective legal means to protect GIs[3]. Many countries have adopted systems to enhance such protection. Within the European Union, the PDO (Protected Designation of Origin) and PGI (Protected Geographical Indication) systems are in force under Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012. PDO status demands that all stages of production occur within a defined region, whereas PGI requires that at least one stage of production be local, thus ensuring the product retains its regional identity[4].
In contrast, the United States lacks a dedicated GI system. Instead, the USPTO protects GIs through its trademark system by registering certification or collective marks that indicate regional origin. This approach, which has been used for decades, remains effective for protecting regional names such as “Idaho” for potatoes or “Florida” for citrus[5].
To know more about this you can follow the link below:
Geographical Indications in India
India’s GI regime is established under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, a sui generis framework that came into force in September 2003. This legislation has not seen major amendments altering its core provisions in recent years, and it continues to serve as the legal basis for protecting products whose qualities are intrinsically linked to their geographic origin[6].
Darjeeling tea remains the flagship example of a GI product in India. It was the first product to be accorded GI status in 2004–05 and is widely recognized for its unique flavor, which is a direct result of the tea gardens’ high-altitude environment in West Bengal. Other products such as Basmati rice, Mysore silk and numerous artisanal handicrafts also benefit from GI protection. In India, only those producers who meet the defined geographical and quality standards may use the registered GI, thereby ensuring authenticity and preventing misuse. The Geographical Indications Registry in Chennai administers this process and issues certificates that serve as prima facie evidence of a product’s GI status[7].
Beyond legal protection, GIs in India are key to rural development. They empower small-scale producers by enabling them to command premium prices in domestic and international markets. Moreover, the GI tag reinforces regional identity and encourages the preservation of traditional methods, which in turn supports sustainable agricultural practices and rural livelihoods.
GIs as Branding Tools
One of the most compelling aspects of geographical indications is their ability to transform a product into a powerful brand. By linking a product to its region, a GI tells a story of authenticity, quality and heritage. The concept of ‘terroir’ central to European food culture illustrates how natural elements (such as climate, soil and topography) and human ingenuity combine to produce goods of distinctive character. Champagne, for example, is not merely a sparkling wine; it is the result of rigorous production methods that have been honed over centuries in a specific part of France, which justifies its premium pricing.
Similarly, in India, the GI tag for Darjeeling tea and other regional products has created a distinct brand identity that stands for excellence and authenticity. As more artisanal producers leverage GIs to market their products, consumers are provided with a reliable guarantee of quality, and local economies benefit from the enhanced value of these goods.
Economic and Social Impact
GIs generate significant economic and social benefits. Economically, they protect producers from imitation, ensuring that only genuine products can benefit from a region’s reputation. This protection enhances marketability, boosts exports and raises the income levels of rural communities. Socially, GIs preserve cultural heritage by safeguarding traditional production methods and local knowledge, thereby promoting sustainable development and community pride.
However, challenges do exist. Critics point out that overly stringent regulations might inhibit innovation or block entry for new producers. There is also ongoing debate, particularly between the EU and countries like the US and Australia, over whether certain geographical names have become generic and should no longer be protected. Despite these concerns, the overall consensus is that GIs play an indispensable role in maintaining product integrity and supporting rural development.
Conclusion
Geographical indications illustrate how places become brands by embedding products with the stories of their origins, unique qualities, and cultural heritage. They function as both legal protection and powerful marketing tools that help producers differentiate their goods and command premium prices. From the prestigious Darjeeling tea of India to the PDO-protected wines of France, GIs not only shield consumers from imitations but also empower rural communities and preserve traditional practices. The robust legal frameworks be it the GI Act in India, TRIPS internationally or the EU’s PDO/PGI system continue to underpin this protection, ensuring that the legacy of regional products endures in an increasingly homogenized global market.
In summary, geographical indications are essential for transforming local products into internationally recognized brands. They legally and economically link products to their unique geographical origins, thereby safeguarding traditional practices, empowering local communities and adding significant market value. The continuing success of these systems—under India’s GI Act, TRIPS, and the EU quality schemes—demonstrates that protecting geographical indications is not only about legal rights but also about preserving cultural heritage and ensuring sustainable development.