Trademark Priority Disputes A Comparative Study of First-to-File and First-to-Use Systems

Introduction

Trademarks serve as valuable business assets, distinguishing products and services in a competitive marketplace. However, conflicts over trademark ownership frequently arise, leading to legal disputes that require an effective resolution mechanism. The two primary legal doctrines used globally to resolve such disputes are first-to-file and first-to-use.

• First-to-file grants rights to the first entity that officially registers a trademark.
• First-to-use recognizes the rights of the party that first uses the mark in commerce, regardless of registration status.

This article examines these systems, highlighting their legal frameworks, international applications, and the advantages and disadvantages associated with each.

First-to-File System

The first-to-file system awards trademark rights based on official registration with the appropriate intellectual property office. Many jurisdictions, including the European Union, China, Japan, and France, adhere to this system.

Legal Framework

Under first-to-file laws, the entity that successfully registers a trademark first is presumed to have superior rights, regardless of prior use by another party. The following elements define this system:

1. Registration as Primary Evidence: The registration certificate serves as prima facie evidence of ownership.
2. Lack of Use Requirement: In many jurisdictions, registration does not initially require proof of use.
3. Priority Principle: The filing date determines ownership, with minimal regard for previous commercial use.

Advantages of First-to-File

• Certainty and Predictability: Since rights are awarded based on registration date, businesses have a clear understanding of ownership.
• Simplified Legal Process: Reduces the burden of proving first commercial use, streamlining legal disputes.
• Encourages Registration: Companies are incentivized to secure their trademarks early, promoting proactive brand protection.

Disadvantages of First-to-File

• Risk of Trademark Squatting: Bad-faith applicants may register trademarks with no intention of using them, forcing legitimate businesses to buy back their own marks.
• Disregard for Market Presence: Prior users of a mark may lose rights despite long-standing brand recognition.
• Cost Implications: Businesses must monitor filings continuously and register in multiple jurisdictions to safeguard their interests.

To know more about this you can follow the link below:

First-to-Use System

The first-to-use system grants trademark rights to the entity that first uses a mark in commerce, even if it has not been officially registered. Countries such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and India follow this approach.

Legal Framework

In first-to-use jurisdictions, the key determinant of ownership is actual and continuous use in commerce. The system incorporates:

1. Common Law Protection: Trademark rights arise from commercial usage rather than formal registration.
2. Requirement of Proof: The claimant must provide evidence of continuous and bona fide use.
3. Recognition of Prior Use: If a dispute arises, the party demonstrating earlier use generally prevails over a later registrant.

Advantages of First-to-Use

• Protection of Established Businesses: Prevents large corporations from overtaking long-standing local brands.
• Deters Trademark Squatting: Ensures that rights belong to genuine users, reducing fraudulent registrations.
• Encourages Market Competition: Small businesses and startups can establish brand presence without immediate registration.

Disadvantages of First-to-Use

• Legal Complexity: Proving first use often involves extensive documentation and litigation.
• Uncertainty in Ownership: Without registration, multiple entities may claim prior use, leading to protracted disputes.
• Global Limitations: First-to-use rights may not be recognized in first-to-file jurisdictions, creating challenges for international brand expansion.

International Perspectives on Trademark Priority

With increasing globalization, businesses must navigate different legal systems to protect their brands. Some countries have implemented hybrid models to balance the benefits of both systems. For instance:

• The United States recognizes common law rights but also provides federal protection through registration.
• China follows a strict first-to-file system but allows challenges based on prior unregistered use under specific conditions.
• The European Union heavily favors first-to-file but provides limited exceptions for earlier users with strong market presence.

Key Case Studies in Trademark Priority Disputes

1. Facebook Inc. v. Facebok.com (China)
• Issue: A third party registered the name “Facebok” in China before Facebook formally entered the market.
• Outcome: The Chinese government upheld the first-to-file principle, forcing Facebook to negotiate a settlement.
2. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) v. Booking.com (USA, 2020)
• Issue: Booking.com argued for exclusive trademark rights despite “Booking” being a generic term.
• Outcome: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that consumer perception, rather than mere registration, determines trademark distinctiveness.

Indian Cases Trademark Priority Disputes

India follows a first-to-use system, meaning trademark rights are granted to the party that can prove prior commercial use rather than just registration. Several landmark cases highlight how Indian courts have adjudicated trademark priority disputes.

1. Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Registrar of Trademarks (2002)

Issue:
Priyanka Overseas, an exporter, applied for the trademark ‘PRIMARK’ in India. However, the UK-based company Primark opposed the registration, claiming global recognition.

Outcome:
The Indian court ruled in favor of Priyanka Overseas, emphasizing prior use in India over international reputation. This case reaffirmed that global presence alone does not override first use in Indian commerce.

2. Century Traders v. Roshan Lal Duggar & Co. (1978)

Issue:
Century Traders had been using the trademark ‘CENTURY’ for textiles before Roshan Lal Duggar & Co. attempted to register it.

Outcome:
The Delhi High Court ruled that prior commercial use prevails over mere registration. This case solidified India's stance on first-to-use doctrine, protecting businesses with unregistered but long-used marks.

3. S. Syed Mohideen v. P. Sulochana Bai (2016, Supreme Court)

Issue:
A dispute arose over the 'Iruttukadai Halwa' trademark between two businesses. The defendant, who was not the original user, attempted to claim ownership based on registration.

Outcome:
The Supreme Court ruled that goodwill and reputation from prior use override formal registration. This case reinforced the importance of market recognition in priority disputes.

4. N. R. Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation (1996, Supreme Court)

Issue:
Whirlpool Corporation sued an Indian company for selling ‘WHIRLPOOL’ branded washing machines, arguing they had reputation in India despite no local sales.

Outcome:
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Whirlpool, recognizing transborder reputation as a valid factor in determining trademark priority. This case created an exception where well-known international brands can claim protection without local use.

5. Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Prius Auto Industries Ltd. (2018, Supreme Court)

Issue:
Toyota claimed exclusive rights over ‘PRIUS’ against an Indian company using it for auto parts. Toyota argued that Prius was globally known as its hybrid car brand.

Outcome:
The Supreme Court ruled against Toyota, stating that since Toyota did not establish prior use or reputation in India before 2001, it could not claim trademark priority. This case reaffirmed India's strong preference for first-to-use over first-to-file.

Best Practices for Businesses in Managing Trademark Priority

• Early Registration: Regardless of jurisdiction, filing trademarks promptly ensures stronger legal standing.
• Continuous Use and Documentation: Maintain records of first commercial use, including invoices, marketing materials, and domain registrations.
• Trademark Monitoring: Regularly check trademark databases to prevent squatting or infringement.
• Legal Counsel and Strategy: Work with IP attorneys to understand the best protection mechanisms in different markets.

Conclusion

Trademark priority disputes are a crucial aspect of intellectual property law, impacting businesses of all sizes. The first-to-file and first-to-use systems each have unique benefits and challenges, influencing how brands protect their identity. While first-to-file ensures legal clarity and administrative ease, first-to-use prioritizes market presence and genuine brand recognition. For businesses operating globally, understanding and strategically navigating these systems is essential for securing long-term trademark protection. As intellectual property laws continue to evolve, international harmonization efforts may lead to a more balanced approach, ensuring fair competition while safeguarding brand equity.